Oct 102014
 

I’ve not got a problem with Malala Yousafzai winning some sort of prize – she deserves to. But a peace prize?

Campaigning for women’s education is hardly likely to lead to peace – the neanderthals that oppose women’s education aren’t likely to take being opposed peacefully. And I’m aware that comparing Islamic fundamentalists to Neanderthals is vastly insulting. To the Neanderthals.

But Malala is saying something that needs saying. Espousing truth as it were.

The trouble is the title of the prize: The Nobel Peace Prize. It’s often awarded for actions that do not promote peace, but for more general humanitarian accomplishments. Perhaps it should be renamed to the Nobel Humanitarian Prize or even the Nobel Truth Prize?

Oct 082014
 

A quaint little place that I don’t think I’ve visited before. Hills, twisty passageways, and strange bits of history (Thomas Paine, and Virginia Wolf).

#1: The Downs

The Downs

#2: The Path

The Path

#3: The Staircase

The Staircase

#4: Weeds For Sale

Weeds For Sale

#5: A Few Flowers

A Few Flowers

Oct 032014
 

According to the Tory party conference, they are planning to “do something” about the European Court of Human Rights, and to stop the British government being overruled by the ECHR. Most of the time we hear about the work of the ECHR through ridiculous stories but the court deals with tens of thousands of cases a year. So most of the time we do not get to hear about it’s work. After all sensible decisions do not make good news stories.

Let’s look at the rights that the ECHR is there to protect :-

  1. respecting rights
  2. life
  3. torture
  4. servitude
  5. liberty and security
  6. fair trial
  7. retroactivity
  8. privacy
  9. conscience and religion
  10. expression
  11. association
  12. marriage
  13. effective remedy
  14. discrimination
  15. derogations
  16. aliens
  17. abuse of rights
  18. permitted restrictions

Which is a long list, and could do with some additional explanation, which can be found here.

The reason the Tories are giving for abolishing our human rights is that they don’t want interference from the European Union in their actions. Which when you come down to it is kind of worrying – our government finds our human rights and the organisation created after World War II to protect those rights “inconvenient”.

There are those who will ramble on about sovereign rights which are important, but not as important as human rights. People are more important than states.

The more the Tories want to evade the oversight of the ECHR, the more I want the ECHR to be keeping an eye on the behaviour of “our” government. The judges of the ECHR may be unelected but they’re more trustworthy than a bunch of corrupt politicians who find our human rights inconvenient.