Are Science Types Ignorant or Are Artistic Types Bigotted ?

Firstly I’ll point out that I don’t really believe that the types mentioned in the headline really exist … all people have artistic sides and scientific sides even if they deny them. I know! I thought I was purely scientific without an artistic bone in my body, but couldn’t stop writing (incompetently) and now I’m obsessed with creating pleasing images (unsuccessfully). However many people do believe that they exist.

I have just finished a book where a literary woman insists that her father is ignorant because he doesn’t read despite the fact that he is a neurosurgeon (which does involve lots of reading) and is a serious music listener. There is enough clues in there for some to guess the book and the author, but I won’t name either because it is a relatively common tendency to run down the knowledge of “scientific types”.

Why? I mean any kind of knowledge is valuable and deciding what knowledge is more valuable than the rest is the kind of game that only the foolish indulge in. Of course “scientific types” have been known to think the opposite … that “artistic types” are the ignorant ones, although for some mysterious reason we don’t get to hear this point of view in the media or great literature.

It is too easy to think of someone who does not spend time learning your knowledge is lazy and ignorant without considering that they may spend a great deal of time learning other stuff that is valuable to them. I don’t as a rule read great works of literature because I either don’t have the time or I am too tired to do the work justice. That doesn’t mean I don’t read.

Comments

2 responses to “Are Science Types Ignorant or Are Artistic Types Bigotted ?”

  1. dragonfly562 avatar
    dragonfly562

    Thats very true – Leonardo Da Vinci was both artistic and scientific and proves that you can be both. A lot of science involves creative thought and some art also requires scientific knowledge (physics – colour theory using pigments or light, mixing oil and water etc…) and the average human brain is capable of both – although the theory that all creative thought is on the right side and scientific thought is on the left side of the brain is perhaps a bit over simplified.
    I used to find when had I spent a long time painting or drawing (or even reading) I would find a shift to rational thought and more scientific matters a welcome contrast. Now that my job involves (far too much) rational and technical knowledge I crave a more creative job but never seem to find the time to start a painting or some work for a portfolio…

  2. dragonfly562 avatar
    dragonfly562

    Perhaps what I meant to say was people are too eager to pigeonhole themselves as creative or scientific/rational/academic and discount & disregard a whole part of their abilities and personality in the process. Its a great shame πŸ™

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *