20mph Speed Limit in Portsmouth

 General, Media  No Responses »
Jun 032007
 

The BBC had a news item about the city of Portsmouth introducing a 20mph speed limit on most roads in the city. Interestingly whilst the web site does say that it is most roads with the limit, the TV story claimed it was all roads in the city. Another example of deceptive media reporting.

Whilst Portsmouth has introduced a 20mph limit on most roads, what was not mentioned is that the main arterial routes within the city are not affected … the 20mph limited roads are principally built-up residential areas. In fact the kind of roads you find at the beginning or end of your journey (unless you are a rat-runner) where such a terribly slow limit (at least 5 times quicker than most people walk) is going to have a relatively small effect on the motorists convenience. And hopefully will have a dramatic effect on the fatality of accidents on these roads.

It would be nice if they had introduced a slightly higher limit on the main routes through the city too … say 30mph. After all there are no real “through routes” in the island that Portsmouth is, so again it would only really be at the beginning or end of a motorist’s journey.

Back to the TV story: Rather than cover the details of the story accurately, the BBC chose to dig up some drivers who were insistent that the 20mph limit was unacceptable and would cause more accidents (and glossing over the fact that even if there were more accidents there would probably still be fewer deaths). Perhaps. But there again it would be less of an interesting story if the BBC hadn’t dug up the lunatic fringe of motorists who believe that it is their right to drive as fast as they wish whatever the effect on anyone else.

MP Steals Disabled Car Parking Spot

 General, Politics  No Responses »
Jun 012007
 

A UK Member of Parliament named Anthony Steen has hit the news headlines for leaving his car in a disabled parking bay for three days. He has come out with some sort of excuse for this blaming disabled people somehow. Probably not quite like that, but I don’t care.

Come out with some genuine argument about how there are too many disabled parking bays and I might pay attention.

But pay attention to some drongo who came out with some sort of argument after he has been caught parking illegally ? Not a chance. This is an example of behaviour that gives politicians a bad name. He’d be far better off by saying “Oops! I shouldn’t have done that”, paid his parking fine, and keep his mouth shut about any criticism of disabled parking.

Funnily enough he’s a member of the political party that used to bang on so much about their being the party of “law and order”. Breaking the parking laws is funny sort of behaviour for an MP from that party isn’t it ?

I guess this little rant makes me one of those “whingers and whiners” that he’s now going on about.

PS3 And Inconveniencing The User

 General, Media  No Responses »
May 312007
 

Sony have recently upgraded the firmware available for PlayStation 3s; one of the features is for “upscaling” DVDs to HD resolution. Not exactly the same thing as blue ray, but definitely worth having especially given my situation. However Sony will only upscale DVDs over an HDMI connection to the TV; if you are limited to a component connection for some reason, you are out of luck.

Now this is not solely Sony’s fault as there is an agreement in place to not release equipment to upscale over any kind of TV connection that does not support anti-piracy measures such as HDCP(?). That rules out component cables.

So what is the reason for this ? To prevent piracy, but who is going to pirate “upscaled” DVDs which will offer quality less than blue ray disks and won’t play on DVD players ? Seems a little unlikely to me, or at least it is unlikely to be a serious commercial threat.

The media companies are yet again inconveniencing the legitimate consumer in the name of preventing piracy despite the evidence that pirates can get around the restrictions anyway.

Wildlife And Farming

 General  No Responses »
May 262007
 

There’s a news item on at the moment about some endangered bears in the Italian Apennine mountains, and the farmers there who are not so keen on them because they steal what the farmers produce.

What I can never understand is why the most obvious solution to this is not tried. Farmers raise livestock to sell in the marketplace; if a wild animal steals that livestock, they lose money. Make up that money fairly (with the price set to what it would have been in the marketplace) and the farmers are likely to stop grumbling so much.

Hell, instead of grumbling about wild animals (and in some cases wandering off in stealth and attempting to terminate the careers of some wild animals) they are likely to suddenly start encouraging the wild animals to breed!

The Motorist, The Pedestrian, Roads and Council Tax

 General, Politics  No Responses »
May 262007
 

A bit of an odd mixture, but this all occurred to me when I was waiting 2 minutes at a pedestrian crossing for a chance to cross the road in 10 seconds; at which point I would have to do this all over again.

It occurred to me that most of the cars whizzing past my nose were being driven by people who didn’t pay the local council tax which funds the local roads whereas I do. Seemed a little unfair that they get more time to get across the crossing than I do, when it is my money paying for everything. Don’t get me wrong … whilst I might like the roads to be a bit cheaper, and we should spend more money on public transport, I still think the roads are worth having.

Of course it is not a simple matter where every pedestrian is a tax payer and every motorist is an outside who doesn’t pay the council tax. And motorists will say that their road tax is being used to pay for the roads … which is true for motorways (which I’m not commenting on here), but not the case for local roads.

I just think we need to redress the balance between the pedestrian and the motorist a little more.

Historically we have gone to an enormous amount of effort to keep traffic moving, and it is time to accept that it just isn’t possible with the levels of traffic we can have in today’s cities. And giving pedestrians a bit more priority on the roads is the polite thing to do given that we are helping pay for the roads. We need equal time to cross the roads that motorists have to cross the pedestrian crossings, and we need more pedestrian crossings.

If it takes a motorist 20 minutes to traverse my city rather than 15 minutes, so what? The motorist will still be well ahead of the pedestrian who will take an hour or more for the same journey so they will still be well ahead.

 Older Entries  Newer Entries