Feb 062012
 

If you read certain articles, you might believe that the current UK government is anti-business. The Tories ? Anti-business ? That is simply preposterous – the Tories would never let the government be anti-business. They are after all in politics to help their business buddies.

What certain bankers don’t understand is that there is a certain level of anti-banking here – which is not anti-business. Banks are merely a subset of business, and given that many banks are “too large to fail” comprise a rather special category of business that is not very business-like.

And the government is not really anti-bank at all, but anti-preposterous banking bonuses. Banking bonuses seem to have risen out of proportion to the value that people add to a bank. As mentioned before, no person is wholly responsible for the success or failure of a bank – a CEO may come up with a great plan, but his or her underlings have to carry out that plan. And the success of the CEO is dependent on how effectively his or her plan is carried out.

Personally I do not have a problem with bankers earning millions in bonuses (and I’m very unlikely to ever get such a bonus), providing that :-

  1. They are properly taxed.
  2. They are proportional to the bonuses given to every other employee in the firm.

It is interesting to see that the bosses of National Rail have voluntarily given up their bonuses into a fund for improving the safety of railway crossings. Whilst there was some pressure about the potential size of their bonuses, it was nowhere near as much as that received by the banking bosses, and they gave up their bonuses a lot quicker – nice to see that some business leaders see that their bonuses may be a little excessive after all, rather than whinging about how the government is “anti-business”.

Jan 302012
 

Looking through my archives, I realised that my ancient guide to the Internet was no longer online. Whilst really only of historical interest, it seems a shame that it is not available for the terminally bored, or those who wish to investigate what the Internet was like during the 1990s.

An online version is available here with a PDF version also available.

Jan 212012
 

One of the things I miss from Solaris are the Solaris Containers – zones – which are extremely useful for isolating lightweight services in their own “virtual machines”. This blog entry is about LXC – Linux Containers. There are of course other methods of accomplishing much the same thing with Linux, but LXC has the advantage that the necessary kernel extensions are included by default.

Or in other words it isn’t necessary to compile a custom kernel. Which has advantages in certain environments.

There are of course some disadvantages too – LXC isn’t quite as mature as some of the alternatives, and there’s a few missing features. But it works well enough.

What?

Operating system level virtualisation, or what I prefer to call lightweight virtualisation is a method by which you can run multiple virtual servers on a single physical (or virtual!) machine. Like normal virtualisation supplied by products such as ESX, Hyper-V, etc., light-weight virtualisation allows you to run multiple servers on a single instance of server hardware (actually you can do this on a virtual server too!).

Operating system level virtualisation is not quite the same as full virtualisation where you get a complete virtual machine with a VGA display, a keyboard, mouse, etc. Instead you trick the first program that starts on a normal Unix (or Linux) system – /sbin/init – into believing that it is running on a machine by itself when it is in fact running inside a specially created environment. That is if you want a full virtual operating system; it is also possible to setup an environment so that a container simply starts a single application.

In some ways this is similar to the ancient chroot mechanism which was often recommended for securely installing applications such as BIND which were prone to attack. But it has been improved with greater isolation from the operating system running on the hardware itself.

Note that I said /sbin/init – these containers do not run their own kernel. Merely their own user processes.

Why?

So why are these containers useful ? Especially in a world where virtualisation is ubiquitous and can even be free (VirtualBox, and various KVM solutions). Well of course they are, or they wouldn’t exist – the equivalent of BSD Jails has been introduced for every single remaining Unix-based system as well as Linux.

First of all, containers provide a perfectly viable virtualisation mechanism if all you require are numbers of Linux machines. Indeed it is possible to use this kind of virtualisation on already virtualised machines – for example on a Cloud-based virtual server (as you might get from Amazon) which could potentially save you money.

Secondly, containers provide lightweight virtualisation in that there is little to no overhead in using them. There is no virtualised CPU, no I/O virtualisation, etc. In most “heavyweight” virtualisation solutions the overhead of virtualisation is negligible except for I/O where there is often a considerable performance hit for disk-based applications.

Next if carefully setup, it is possible to reduce the incremental cost of each server installation if you use containers rather than full virtual machines. Every additional server you run has a cost associated with maintaining it in terms of money and time; a variety of different mechanisms can reduce this incremental cost, but there is still a cost there. Containers can be another means of reducing this incremental cost by making it easier to manage the individual servers.

As an example, it is possible to update which DNS servers each container uses by simply copying the /etc/resolv.conf file to each container :-

for container in $(lxc-ls | sort | uniq)
do
  cp /etc/resolv.conf /srv/lxc/${container}/rootfs/etc/resolv.conf
done

It’s also very handy for testing – create a container on a test server to mess around with some component or other to find out how it should be installed, and then throw away the container. This avoids “corrupting” a test server with the results of repeated experiments over time.

Of course there are also reasons why you should not use them.

First of all, it is another virtualisation technology to learn. Not a difficult one, but there is still more to learn.

In addition, it does not provide complete isolation – if you need to reboot the physical server, you will have to reboot all of the containers. So it is probably not a good technology for multiple servers that need to stay up forever – although the only real way of arranging that is to use a load balancer in front of multiple servers (even clustering sometimes requires an outage).

There is also the fact that this is not entirely a mature technology. That is not to say it isn’t stable, but more that the tools are not quite polished as yet

Finally there are hints that containers do not provide complete isolation – someone with root access on a container might be able to escape from the container. Thus it is probably not a good solution to provide isolation for security reasons.

How ?

The following instructions assume the use of Debian, although most modern distributions should be perfectly fine too – I’ve also done this with SLES, and seen instructions for ArchLinux. You can also mix and match distributions – SLES as the master operating system, and Debian for the distribution in the containers. That works perfectly fine.

To see if your currently running kernel supports the relevant extensions, see if the cgroups filesystem is available :-

# grep cgroup /proc/filesystems
nodev	cgroup

If the grep command doesn’t return the output as shown, you will need to upgrade and/or build your own kernel. Which is a step beyond where I’m going.

Initial Setup

Before installing your first container, you need to setup your server to support LXC. This is all pretty simple – the most complicated part is to setup your server to use a bridged adapter as it’s network interface. Which we will tackle first.

To start with, install the bridge-utils package :-

# apt-get install bridge-utils

Next edit your /etc/interfaces file. Leave the section dealing with the loopback interface (lo) alone and comment out anything relating to eth0. Once that’s done, add something to setup the bridge interface (br0) with :-

auto br0
iface br0 inet dhcp
   bridge_ports eth0
   bridge_fd 0

That sets up a bridged interface configured with an address supplied by a DHCP server – not perhaps the best idea for a production server, but perfectly fine for a test server. At least if you have a DHCP server on the network! If you need to configure a static address, copy the relevant parts from your commented out section – the address, netmask, and gateway keywords can be added below bridge_fd.

At this point it is worth rebooting the server to check that the new network interface is working fine. You could perform all of the steps in this initial setup section and do a reboot just at the end, but I prefer to reboot after each step when I’m trying something new. It’s easier to find the horrible mistake when you do it step by step.

Assuming the reboot fine, the next step is to automatically mount the cgroup filesystem. Add the following to the end of the /etc/fstab file :-

cgroup        /cgroup        cgroup        defaults    0    0

Make the /cgroup directory, and try to mount the filesystem :-

mkdir /cgroup
mount /cgroup

At this point you should be able to see a whole bunch of files in the /cgroup directory, but it won’t show up if you try a df. You should also reboot at this point to make sure that the filesystem automatically mounts when the system boots.

The final stage is to install the LXC runtime package :-

apt-get install lxc debootstrap

Note that the LXC package is available for many distributions, and the debootstrap package is a shell script runnable under most distributions given the presence of the right set of tools.

Now we are ready to start creating containers. Well, almost.

Creating Containers

When creating containers, it is usual to use a helper script to do the donkey work of setting this up. The LXC runtime package includes a number of such helper scripts. These scripts are very useful, but it is also worth indicating that they may require some local customisation – for instance the template script I used sets the root password to root; whilst it does suggest that this should be changed when the container is built, it is also very sensible to change this initial password to something at least half-reasonable.

And the longer and more extensively you use containers, the more local customisations you are likely to want. For instance, I tend to use a bind to ensure that the /site filesystem is mounted under each container, so I can be sure that my local scripts and configuration files are available on each and every container easily. So :-

  cd /usr/lib/lxc/templates
  cp lxc-debian lxc-local

When not using Debian, it is possible that the template scripts are installed in the main $PATH. In which case you may choose to remove them, or move them somewhere else to avoid their use in preference to your own versions.

It is also worth creating a template configuration file for the lxc-create script :-

cat > /etc/lxc/lxc.conf
lxc.network.type=veth
lxc.network.link=br0
lxc.network.flags=up
^D

To create your first container :-

  mkdir -p /var/lib/lxc/first
  lvcreate --name root-first --size=768M /dev/debian
  mkfs -t ext3 /dev/debian/root-first
  {Edit /etc/fstab to mount the new filesystem at /var/lib/lxc/first}
  mount /var/lib/lxc/root-first
  lxc-create -n first -t local -f /etc/lxc/lxc.conf

This goes through the process of “bootstrapping” Debian into a directory on your current system and setting up a configuration for your LXC container. Once complete, you are ready to start but first you will notice that I created a filesystem for the container’s root filesystem which should be self-evidently necessary if you want to avoid the possibility of a badly behaved container from bringing down other containers.

There are of course other things you can do at this stage before starting the container for the first time – for instance editing /srv/lxc/first/rootfs/etc/network/interfaces may be necessary to enter a static address which is particularly useful

Starting The Container

Once you have created a container, you will probably want to start it :-

lxc-start --daemon --name=first

You can start a container without the “daemon” option, but this means you are immediately connected to the console and it can be difficult to escape from. To connect to the system’s console try lsx-console, which should result in something like :-

# lxc-console --name=first

Type  to exit the console
--hit return here--
Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 first tty1

first login:

At this point you can login as root, and “fix” your container as you would do with an ordinary server. Install the software you need, make any changes you want, etc.

But there is one most noticeable oddity – rebooting a container does not seem to work properly. It seems to get stuck at the point where a normal server would reset the machine to boot again. Undoubtedly this will be fixed at some point … it’s possible that the fix is relatively simple anyway.

But for now the sequence :-

(in the container) shutdown -h now
(in the server) lxc-stop --name ${name-of-container}
(in the server) lxc-start --name ${name-of-container}

Will have to do.

Jan 192012
 

Took me a long time to get around to processing these, but they are ready now …

Who Eats Who?

Who Eats Who?

This beastie was real close, but they’re perfectly harmless!

The Swan

The Swan

The Claw

The Claw

I have no idea what this really is, and I’m pretty sure I don’t want to know … to me it’s the claw.

Traffic Cone

Traffic Cone

Someone had a fun night out.

Surfaces

Surfaces

 

Jan 112012
 

According to the BBC it has been announced that the current curriculum for computer training (ICT) in schools is to be torn up and replaced. And curiously enough the new curriculum is to include programming to a certain extent – as people have been urging for decades.

The first programming language intended for use by children was the Logo programming language first developed in 1967. So it is not as if this is a new idea.

To many of us, the most interesting aspect of computers is not that they allow us to use applications such as word processors, web browsers, and the like – all very useful tools that I would not want to give up – but that they can be controlled by programming. This could be as low-level as writing a device driver in C, or could be using some application macro language to automate a tedious task.

It is perhaps an over simplification to say so, but to a certain extent programming is that last bit – automating tedious tasks. Computers are good at tedious tasks; humans are not. We should be “teaching” computers to perform tedious tasks for us, and that is called programming.

Programming can of course get rather tricky particularly the lower the level you are getting to, but it can also be quite easy with an interactive language with more or less immediate results. For instance the old BASIC :-

10 for i = 1 to 80
20 print "Hello"
30 next i

Can be quickly typed in and then run gives an immediate result – the computer “says” hello to you. A simple example that can be typed in quickly, modified to give a more personal result … or enhanced to give different and slightly more interesting results. The immediacy is important to hook people in and interest them in programming.

And programming is not just useful for those who want to become programmers. Someone who has been introduced to programming may well be better able to :-

  1. Better specify to an IT department what they need, or the error they’re encountering. This will save time and money.
  2. Better appreciate what is and what is not possible.
  3. Be capable of automating computing tasks themselves – not quite programming, but very similar.