Sep 122006
 

UK churches are interesting buildings. Some of of relatively little worth admittedly, but most are of genuine historical interest and add to the flavour of our country. Many if not most of the most interesting ones are ‘owned’ by the descendant of the official state religion … the church of England.

Now the CofE has a bit of a problem … it has to maintain all those historic churches with ever decreasing funds provided by their members. Sometimes these funds can be added to by grants by organisations whose purpose is to maintain historic buildings, but that leaves the problem of those churches that are not quite interesting enough to attract grants.

Of course it would be wrong for the government to help out the church as things stand … because the taxpayer would be subsidising a religion that they may not support to the exclusion of other religions. Plus to many people in our communities, CofE churches are mysterious buildings where strange (and to some ‘blasphemous’) rites are practised to the exclusion of those who don’t share the right religion. This is a very large change from the time when many of those churches were built when each church was the centre of the local community and was inclusive.

Originally the building of those churches was funded by the local community … either through compulsory tithes, or even directly where a group of local people would form a savings group to gather enough money for a church. It seems wrong to restrict the use of the local church to just those who worship a particular God.

So take the churches off the CofE and grant them to the local council with a covenant that requires them to be used for worship. They can then be shared amongst the local community … Christians get to use them on a Sunday, Jews on a Saturday, and Muslims on a Friday. Ideally they would be used by other religions as well, but the ‘big three’ conveniently choose different days to worship on.

After all the original intention was that the churches would be owned by the local community represented by the church, but things have changed and the church is no longer representative of the local community.

Sep 092006
 

There are many people today are worried about what fundamentalist moslems are up to with their suicide bombers, insistence on sharia law, and general intolerance. They are half right.

We don’t have to worry about muslims any more than we have to worry about christians, hindus, or buddhists. It is the fundamentalists that we should be worried about. Whatever religion they claim as their own, their real religion is fundamentalism. It is not enough for them to worship their god, but they want to impose their god on everyone else without regard to how impractical that is.

And the more extreme fundamentalists are prepared to go to almost any lengths to get to their goal … a world that only tolerates the worship of one god and has no tolerance for any diversity. They don’t recognise and are not capable of recognising that people of a different religeon can be worthy in any way or even have any right to exist.

Whether it is desireable or not, such a world cannot and will never exist because there are more than one kind of fundamentalist in the world, and some of us will not tolerate being told what god to worship. The only result a fundamentalist is capable of producing is ferrocious conflict between like-minded “nutters of god” who just happen to worship different gods.