




Just a test really … and a demonstration of why you need to print big (one of those black blobs on the water is a guy on a board).
(This is definitely a work in progress; I’ve still got more lens adaptors to buy and more lenses to test)
So I have a new Fujifilm GFX50R with one native lens (63mm) and my fortunes don’t extend to buying more lenses any time soon. Yet I hear that some 35mm lenses will work even though they’re designed to cover the smaller sensor of 35mm (or in many of the cases below 35mm film).
As someone who has been sticking third-party lenses (and I don’t mean Sigma lenses with an EF mount) on my Canon cameras for years the obvious thing to do is buy some adaptors to test the lenses I have.
And on the grounds that I would find this information useful if someone else had posted it (and I’d found it), I decided to put this out there. No guarantees on the accuracy though!
Caveats :-
| Lens | Photo? | Soft Vignetting | Hard Vignetting | Sample (links) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeiss Makro-Planar 2/100mm ZE | ✓ | No | No | 1 |
| Zeiss Distagon 21/2.8 ZE | ✓ | No | Yes | 1 |
| MC Zenitar 16/2.8 | ✗ | – | Yes | |
| Sigma 12-24 @ 12mm | ✓ | No | No | |
| Sigma 12-24 @ 24mm | ✓ | Yes | Yes | |
| Canon 24-105mm f/4.0 L | ✗ | Yes | Yes | |
| Canon 200-400mm mk1 @ 200 | ✗ | No | No | |
| Canon 200-400mm mk1 @ 400 | ✗ | – | Yes | |
| Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/19mm (1977) | ✗ | – | Yes | |
| Leica Summilux-R 1.4/50mm (1971) | ✗ | Below f/11 | No | |
| Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/35mm (1984) | ✗ | Yes | No | |
| Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/180mm (1975) | ✓ | No | No | |
| Leica Elmarit-R 2.8/90mm (1966) | ✓ | No | No | 1 |
| Leica Macro-Elmerit-R 2.8/60mm (1977) | ✓ | Below f/4.0 | No | |
| Leica Summicron-R 2/50mm (1965) | TODO | TODO | TODO | |
| Olympus OM 18mm f/3.5 | ✓ | – | Yes | |
| Olympus OM 85mm f/2.0 | ✓ | Yes | No | |
| Olympus OM 35mm f/2.8 | ✓ | Yes | No | |
| Carl Zeiss Jena 3.5/135mm | ✓ | No | No | 1 |




