{"id":2973,"date":"2013-07-23T21:45:31","date_gmt":"2013-07-23T21:45:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/really.zonky.org\/?p=2973"},"modified":"2013-07-23T21:45:31","modified_gmt":"2013-07-23T21:45:31","slug":"camerons-confused-plans-for-a-cleaner-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/?p=2973","title":{"rendered":"Cameron&#8217;s Confused Plans for a &#8220;Cleaner Internet&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sign me up for the perv&#8217;s list &#8230; I won&#8217;t trust a politician to come up with a sensible method of censorship, and neither should you.<\/p>\n<p>Ignoring the civil liberties thing: That politicians with a censorship weapon will tend to over use it, to the eventual detriment of legitimate debate.<\/p>\n<p>How is Cameron&#8217;s censorship thing supposed to work? It appears nobody has a clear idea. Probably not even Cameron himself.<\/p>\n<p>It\u00a0<em>seems<\/em> to be two separate measures :-<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"line-height: 13px;\">Completely block &#8220;extreme&#8221; porn: child abuse images, and &#8220;rape porn&#8221;. Oddly enough, he also claimed that &#8220;50 Shades of Grey&#8221; would not be banned although there are <a href=\"http:\/\/witchlingfumbles.tumblr.com\/post\/39285871440\/next-time-im-arguing-with-mom-whether-50-shades-of\">those<\/a> who categorise it as rape porn. Interestingly this is nothing new as child abuse images have been blocked for years ineffectively.<i><br \/>\n<\/i><\/span><\/li>\n<li>An &#8220;optional&#8221; mechanism for blocking some other mysterious category of porn &#8211; the &#8220;family filter&#8221; mechanism.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Now it all sounds quite reasonable, but firstly let&#8217;s take a look at the first measure. Blocking child abuse images sounds like a great idea &#8230; and indeed it is something that is already done by the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iwf.org.uk\/\">Internet Watch Foundation<\/a>. Whilst their work is undoubtedly valuable &#8211; at the very least it prevents accidental exposure to child abuse images &#8211; it probably doesn&#8217;t stop anyone who is\u00a0<em>serious<\/em> about obtaining access to such porn. There are just too many ways around even a country-wide block.<\/p>\n<p>Onto the second measure.<\/p>\n<p>This means that anyone with an Internet connection has to decide when signing up whether they want to be &#8220;family friendly&#8221; or if they want to be added to the government&#8217;s list of perverts &#8230; or possibly the ISP&#8217;s list of perverts. Of course, how quickly do you think that list will be extracted and leaked? I&#8217;m sure the gutter press is salivating at the thought of getting hold of those lists to see what famous people opt to get all the porn; the same gutter press that won&#8217;t be blocked despite publishing pictures that some might say meet the criteria for being classified as porn (see <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Page_3\">Page 3<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>And who decides what gets onto the &#8220;naughty list&#8221; of stuff that you have to sign up as a perv to see? What is the betting that there will be\u00a0<em>lots<\/em> of mistakes?<\/p>\n<p>As we already block access by default to &#8220;adult sites&#8221; on mobile networks, I have already encountered this problem. Not as you might imagine, but whilst away on a course I used an &#8220;app&#8221; to locate hostelries around my location. On clicking on the link to take me to a local pub&#8217;s web site to see a few more details, I was blocked. The interesting thing here is that the app had no problems telling me\u00a0<em>where<\/em> the pub was, but the pub&#8217;s web site was blocked. Two standards for some reason?<\/p>\n<p>And there are plenty of other examples of misclassification such as Facebook&#8217;s long running problem with blocking access to breast feeding information, hospitals having to remove censorship products so that surgeons could get to breast cancer information sites, etc. I happen to work in a field where sales critters are desperate to sell censorship products, and I&#8217;m aware that many places that do install such products have the endless fun of re-classifying sites.<\/p>\n<p>And finally, given this is all for the sake of the children, who thinks that children will come up with ways to get around the &#8220;family filter&#8221; anyway? It is almost impossible to completely censor Internet access without extreme measures such as pulling the entire country off the Internet &#8211; even China with it&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Great_Firewall\">Great Firewall<\/a> is unable to completely censor Internet activity. Solutions such as <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Proxy_server\">proxies<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/VPN\">VPN<\/a> access, and <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tor_(anonymity_network)\">Tor<\/a> all make censorship impossible to make totally effective. If you are thinking that this is all too technical for children, you are sorely mistaken &#8230; for a start it does not take many children able to figure this stuff out as they will distribute their knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>This not to say that a censorship mechanism that\u00a0<em>you<\/em> control is not a sensible idea. You can select what to censor &#8211; prevent the children getting access to information about the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Spaghetti_monster\">Flying Spaghetti Monster<\/a>, but block access to other religious sites, etc. And such a product has to be network-wide, to prevent someone plugging in an uncensored device; such as using the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendns.com\/\">OpenDNS<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opendns.com\/home-solutions\/parental-controls\/\">FamilyShield<\/a>\u00a0(although I have never used it, I believe it to be a good product from independent reports). Of course even DNS blocking can be worked around, but it&#8217;s a reasonable effort.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sign me up for the perv&#8217;s list &#8230; I won&#8217;t trust a politician to come up with a sensible method of censorship, and neither should you. Ignoring the civil liberties thing: That politicians with a censorship weapon will tend to over use it, to the eventual detriment of legitimate debate. How is Cameron&#8217;s censorship thing <a href='https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/?p=2973' class='excerpt-more'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[4,3,489],"tags":[1111,748,1110,876],"class_list":["post-2973","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-it","category-politics","category-security","tag-cameron","tag-dns","tag-opendns","tag-porn","category-4-id","category-3-id","category-489-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd","meta-position-corners","fix"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p1f2KI-LX","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2973","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2973"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2973\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2975,"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2973\/revisions\/2975"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2973"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2973"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/really.zonky.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2973"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}